xf86-video-r128 Version 6.11 released

I released xf86-video-r128 DDX for ATI Technologies RAGE 128 sometime yesterday.  It is a bug fix release where some RAGE 128 Pro cards get their VGA mistakenly recognized as DVI.  Worse, EDID (Extended Display Identification) based automatic detection of display was not working properly, and this was leading to the display complaining about “out of range” display signal being sent from the graphics chip.  This situation required the user to specify the monitor refresh rate inside xorg.conf.  With this release, there is no longer the need to do this.

At least the fix I committed fixes one bug, and there has been no new release for a while, so I just went ahead and released a new one.  Starting with Version 6.11, I will be changing the version naming convention, and patch level (i.e., the third number) will be going up more frequently as I rewrite / add new code.  For the next few months, most of my development effort for RAGE 128 DDX will be to stabilize the existing DDX UMS (User Mode Setting) code.

As of Version 6.11 release, the code contains these two major issues.

  • Standby resume freezes the computer upon resume
  • Occasional display of junk on the screen (i.e., when scrolling within a window or dragging a window)

I am actively working on both issues, but have not found the solution to the issues yet.

Anyway, if you support my work fixing and enhancing abandoned old graphics device driver, please consider a small donation through my donation link here.

OpenChrome DRM drm-next-4.18 branch is now EOL

OpenChrome DRM drm-next-4.18 branch is now EOL.  The bleeding edge development has now transitioned to drm-next-4.19 branch.  Due to DRM maintainer changing the Linux DRM subsystem upstream repository location, I lost sync with the repository for a while.  Besides that, Linux 4.17-rc5 had file system (BTRFS) related boot issues, so I had to wait until Linux 4.18-rc1 or rc2 to update the drm-next-4.18 branch and then transition to drm-next-4.19 branch.  Now that I caught up with the bleeding edge of DRM subsystem, I plan to pour more time into OpenChrome DRM development along with continuing the development of xf86-video-r128 DDX.

My first bug fix patch for RAGE 128 DDX posted

Now that I have commit privilege for x.org X Server components, I was able to push some commits into the xf86-video-r128 DDX (RAGE 128 DDX) repository.  However, these commits did not alter the behavior of the code too much (they were almost all code refactoring commits), and did not fix any known problems of the code.

A few days ago when I was setting up my 64-bit x86 (x86-64 or AMD64) instruction set capable computer with an AGP slot for the purpose of kicking RAGE 128 DDX development into high gear, I plugged in RAGE 128 Pro Ultra 16 MB AGP graphics card into the AGP slot.  Unfortunately, the monitor connected to the graphics card complained about “out of range” signal coming out of the VGA connector.  I remembered that this particular card had this same issue back in Year 2015, and I reported the VGA display detection issue of RAGE 128 Pro Ultra back then.  Somehow, the bug report was closed with “RESOLVED FIXED” status even though the bug is still there.  Note that this bug affects certain models of RAGE 128 Pro, and not all models of RAGE 128 Pro are affected. The particular graphics card I used here is a pull from a Dell desktop PC.

I remembered that there is a workaround for this bug, and it is to limit the display frequency of the attached monitor via xorg.conf file.  With this workaround, display appears to work okay, but now the display is misidentified as DVI rather than VGA.  Since this workaround is merely a temporary band-aid, I decided to analyze the RAGE 128 DDX code to see what is going on, and try to fix the issue.  After analyzing the code, I came to the conclusion that the current RAGE 128 DDX code does not really detect the available display resources very well, and it will require a lot of work to try to fix the code.

For now, I will settle for a quick fix to the code that only benefits RAGE 128 on x86 platform.  This is because the fix relies on video BIOS supplied available display resources table, and it is unclear if there was something comparable to this on Apple PowerMac platform.  If you have any information about it, please contact me since I do not wish to break the code for PowerMac users.  Furthermore, if you have RAGE Mobility 128, M3, or M4, please test the patch as well to see if FP on your laptop is still working.  With this fix, I no longer have to limit the display frequency of the attached monitor, and X Server recognizes the attached monitor as VGA.  The patch is here and my supplemental post is here.

If I were to repost the instructions on how to compile the RAGE 128 DDX with the patch applied, this is what it looks like. Please note that ‘(“. . .”)’ portion should be replaced with actual storage location, and I assume that you are using Ubuntu based OS.

sudo cp /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/r128_drv.so (“Anywhere appropriate to store a backup”)
sudo apt-get install git
sudo apt-get build-dep xserver-xorg-video-r128
(“sudo apt-get build-dep xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04” for Ubuntu 16.04 with HWE)
mkdir (“Whatever appropriate name for a directory”)
git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-r128
cd xf86-video-r128
patch -p 1 < (“File name of the patch”)
./autogen.sh –prefix=/usr CFLAGS=”-Wall”
(‘./autogen.sh –prefix=/usr –enable-dri CFLAGS=”-Wall”‘ if you want DRI1 enabled)
make
sudo make install

If it did not work, you should be able to restore the r128 DDX this way.

sudo cp (“Location where the backup of r128_drv.so was stored”)/r128_drv.so /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/

If the patch does not cause a regression with PowerMac or RAGE Mobility based laptops, I will go ahead and release a new version of xf86-video-r128 DDX with this fix in the next few weeks.  Please note that this fix is just the first step, and I plan to fix several more issues of the code over the next few months.

If you appreciate my work on RAGE 128 graphics stack, please financially support me through a small donation via PayPal.  Part of the donation will pay for the increased electricity cost of running fairly power hungry AMD Opteron 165 on ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 mainboard.

Currently working on getting GPIO based I2C bus working for OpenChrome DDX

I am currently working on getting MSI CN700T mainboard’s DVI to properly handle the screen resolutions the monitor actually supports. At the present time, the DVI coming out of this mainboard can display certain screen resolutions X Server provides by default if EDID was not received by the DDX. I do not find this behavior to be very desirable. The issue I am observing here is that VIA Technologies VT1632A DVI transmitter is connected to GPIO2 / 3 pins to emulate I2C bus, but it is not working for the purpose of receiving EDID. That being said, it works for the purpose of detecting and controlling VT1632A. Please note that the code I am talking about is the existing OpenChrome DDX UMS (User Mode Setting) code for the upcoming Version 0.7 release.

Strange twist (?) to this saga is that if I let OpenChrome DRM to perform KMS (Kernel Mode Setting), its GPIO based I2C code works well, and I am able to obtain EDID from the monitor.

Finally was able to commit into xf86-video-r128 upstream repository

After weeks of delays, I was notified today that I now have the commit privilege to commit into xorg related components. Prior to this, I published 4 patches related to xf86-video-r128 DDX over at xorg-driver-ati mailing list. I used git-am to apply the patches to my local xf86-video-r128 repository.

git am (“Name of the patch”)

Since I had 4 patches, I repeated the above operation 4 times. Then, I pushed the changes to the upstream repository.

git push

Here is the first of the 4 patches I committed into the xf86-video-r128 DDX upstream repository.